Logo

How do you weigh in on the Vance-couch conversation?

Last Updated: 19.06.2025 13:38

How do you weigh in on the Vance-couch conversation?

This, if he’d done it, would be perfectly okay.

It’s a creative form of masturbation that may feel pretty darn good.

I don’t see what’s wrong with banging couches.

Do you even realise that NASA could've hid or bury every single piece of evidence for a flat-earth and exaggerate their evidence? Have you ever question materialist scientific narratives?

Creativity is also good, especially as the story would cause no harm to the couch and didn’t involve any direct contact with it. There’s no ick factor here, just a young person having fun in a way that doesn’t harm or impose upon anyone else.

Vance didn’t, or that’s the story. And honestly, I believe it. He’s a bit too uptight for that sort of thing.

Decadent Girl by Ramon Casas. Public domain.

Why do women stubbornly refuse to let men lead, even though they are attracted to the man, and the man both loves and desires them? Why do they get angry and blame the man when he gets fed up and walks away, when it's entirely their own fault?

We need to stop shaming people for healthy activities they do in the privacy of their own homes.

But what if he had? Why are we shaming him for this? Why would we shame anyone for this?

Masturbation isn’t bad. It provides most of the benefits of sex, many of which actively improve human health, with zero risk of disease or pregnancy. It is an objectively good thing that most of us ought to do more often. Not for pleasure, though pleasure is also good, but for our health.

If you’re an atheist, what would be your motive in spreading atheism, and why would you care what others believe?